Evidence Hub

Reduced-dose radiotherapy for stage IE gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: a multi-institutional prospective study (KROG 16-18)

S. Jeon, J. Chang, Il Han Kim, H. I. Yoon, K. Eom

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2024

62 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

Definitive radiotherapy (RT) of 30 Gy or higher is commonly recommended to treat Helicobacter pylori-independent gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma with an excellent disease control rate. However, the efficacy of reduced-dose RT has not yet been evaluated in a prospective cohort study. This multi-institutional study aimed to determine the role of reduced-dose RT in the treatment of stage IE gastric MALT lymphoma.

METHODS

Between March 2017 and June 2022, 62 patients with histologically confirmed stage IE gastric MALT lymphoma without evidence of H. pylori infection were enrolled. The patients were treated with reduced-dose RT at a total dose of 24-25.5 Gy to the entire stomach. The response to therapy was evaluated by endoscopy with a biopsy of suspicious lesions if necessary. The primary endpoints were 6-month complete remission (CR) and local failure-free survival (LFFS).

RESULTS

Among 62 patients, 32 (51.6%) were previously treated for H. pylori eradication. Radiotherapy was delivered using 3D-conformal (n=20, 32.3%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (n=42, 67.7%). The median follow-up duration was 34.5 months (range, 9.6-68.8 months). The 6-month CR rate was 96.7%. The 5-year LFFS and progression-free survival rates were 92.0% and 90.4%, respectively. None of the patients experienced grade 3 or worse acute toxicities, and grade 2 acute toxicities were reported in 17 patients (27.4%).

CONCLUSION

Reduced-dose RT exhibited excellent response…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 62 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free