Evidence Hub

Safety and efficacy of lifileucel (LN-144), an autologous, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy in combination with pembrolizumab for immune checkpoint inhibitor naïve patients with advanced melanoma

S. Thomas, G. In, B. Doger, S. Haefliger, J. Martín-Liberal, Z. Goldberg, A. Cacovean, R. Fiaz et al.

2021

7 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

9537 Background: Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy in advanced melanoma, both in the pre-immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) setting (Goff, JCO 2016) and in patients who have failed anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (Sarnaik, 2020). Combination of TIL and pembrolizumab (pembro) in ICI-naïve patients has demonstrated encouraging efficacy data with acceptable safety in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Jimeno, 2020). To improve treatment options in early lines, we explore a combination of LN-144 and pembro in patients with ICI-naïve advanced melanoma. Methods: IOV-COM-202 is a Phase 2 multicenter, multi-cohort, open-label study evaluating TIL cell therapy in multiple settings and indications. We report on Cohort 1A enrolling ICI-naïve advanced melanoma (unresectable or metastatic) patients for treatment with a combination of LN-144 and pembro. Key eligibility criteria include ≤ 3 lines of prior therapy, ECOG ULN. Mean SOD for the target lesions was 111 mm, with 86% of patients with > 3 target lesions, representing advanced disease at baseline for this patient group. The TEAE profile was consistent with the underlying disease and known AE profiles of pembro, NMA-LD and IL-2. Six patients had a confirmed objective response with an ORR of 86% (1 CR, 5 PR) and 1 best response of SD. Three of the responding patients have remained off pembro due to pembro related AEs for 3, 4 and 13 months (mos), yet maintaining response. All responding…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 7 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free