Evidence Hub

Clinical and Transcriptomic Response to Secukinumab in Korean Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Su-Jin Moon, Young-In Lee, H. Kwon, Ji Hwan Moon, Haivin Kim, Jung Eun Kim, Jihee Kim, D. H. Kim et al.

Dermatology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent painful nodules, abscesses, and tunnels, primarily affecting intertriginous areas. While IL-17-targeting biologics, including bimekizumab and secukinumab, have shown efficacy in moderate-to-severe HS, data in Asian populations remain limited. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical efficacy of secukinumab in Korean patients with moderate-to-severe HS and to perform an exploratory analysis of treatment-associated transcriptomic changes. Methods: Twenty-five patients with moderate-to-severe HS enrolled in a Managed Access Program (MAP) cohort received secukinumab 300 mg/week for 4 weeks, and then every 2 weeks through week 16. Clinical outcomes were assessed every 4 weeks. Paired lesional skin biopsies (baseline and week 12) from 3 patients underwent RNA sequencing to evaluate transcriptomic changes. Results: At week 16, 86.96% of patients achieved Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), 78.26% reached a ≥55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4 55), and 81.81% reported a ≥30% improvement in skin pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-30). Transcriptomic analysis revealed downregulation genes involved in epidermal development, keratinocyte differentiation, and antimicrobial response and upregulation of cell cycle-related pathways. Conclusions: Secukinumab demonstrated substantial clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free