Evidence Hub

MATRiX: A randomized phase II trial of tuvusertib (ATR inhibitor) with or without avelumab in advanced anti-PD(L)-1 refractory Merkel cell carcinoma

R. Bhakuni, E. Hall, Ted Gooley, Y. Mowery, G. Ansstas, A. Brohl, M. Burgess, Maya Dimitrova et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2026

50 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

LBA9514

Background:

Advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) often responds to anti-PD-(L)1, but patients (pts) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-refractory disease have poor outcomes and few therapy options. MCC has defects in G1 checkpoint control, proliferates rapidly, and is reliant on S/G2 checkpoints such as ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related). Inhibiting ATR can promote immunogenic cell death. MATRiX (MCC refractory to immunotherapy treated with ATR inhibitor ± avelumab) is a multicenter, NCI-sponsored, randomized, open-label phase II trial evaluating tuvusertib, an ATR inhibitor, alone (Arm 1) or in combination with avelumab (Arm 2) in anti-PD-(L)1-refractory MCC, NCT05947500.

Methods:

Pts were randomized 1:1 using a permuted-block design. Arm 1 received tuvusertib 180 mg PO on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle. Arm 2 received tuvusertib as in Arm 1, plus avelumab 1600 mg IV every 21 days. Pts with disease progression in Arm 1 were eligible to cross over to Arm 2. The planned sample size (N=50; 25 per Arm) provided >80% power to observe a statistically significant (1-sided level of 0.15) difference in the primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), assuming a hazard ratio of 0.5. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, and overall survival (OS). Data cutoff: January 20, 2026.

Results:

From 5/2024 to 9/2025, 35 subjects (median age 73) received therapy: Arm 1, n=10; Arm 2, n=25. One pt was deemed ineligible…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free