Evidence Hub

Holmes Tremors in a 60-year-old Woman Following Primary Brainstem hemorrhage (PBH) Responsive to Standard Dose of Trihexyphenidyl: A case report and literature review

Gloire Chubaka Magala, É. Diarra, Sac Agbo-Panzo, PT Folatet, Ant Essoin, C. Kadjo, FD Offoumou, M. Amon-Tanoh et al.

Journal Africain des Cas Cliniques et Revues, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: The Holmes tremor, once known as rubral or mesencephalic tremor, is an uncommon and atypical condition that presents as an irregular resting tremor, often accompanied by an action tremor that worsens with certain postures. This phenomenon is primarily caused by vascular or traumatic injuries that impact the cerebellothalamocortical pathway and the Guillain-Mollaret triangle. Currently, there is no therapeutic protocol based on randomized clinical trials, and the efficacy of the proposed treatments varies significantly. First-line pharmacological treatments include levodopa, levetiracetam, and trihexyphenidyl, the latter frequently prescribed at high doses. We present a case of Holmes tremor associated with a pontine-mesencephalic hematoma, which showed a favorable response to standard-dose trihexyphenidyl.

Clinical case: A 60-year-old patient presented with a hemorrhagic stroke in the brainstem secondary to hypertensive microangiopathy, characterized by a sudden disturbance in consciousness and a favorable outcome. After twenty-six days, Holmes tremors were observed in the right brachiofacial area. The patient was started on trihexyphenidyl at standard doses, which were gradually increased to a total of 12 mg taken in three doses, resulting in nearly complete resolution of the tremors. At the three-month follow-up, the patient exhibited only mild dysarthria as a residual effect.

Conclusion: The choice to administer trihexyphenidyl was particularly challenging…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free