Evidence Hub

Transperineal Laser Ablation of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Median-Lobe Enlargement: A Single-Center Experience

Ruffo A, Stanojevic N, Crocetto F, Barone B, Holy P, Altieri VM, Spirito L, Esposito F

Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2026

31 participants

Abstract

Objectives: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with median-lobe enlargement (MLE) is a distinct and challenging clinical entity contributing to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Minimally invasive treatments, such as transperineal laser ablation (TPLA), offer potential advantages in treating this subgroup, but limited data exist regarding their outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EchoLaser TPLA of symptomatic BPH with MLE.

Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated 31 patients with symptomatic BPH and MLE who underwent EchoLaser TPLA at a private clinic. EchoLaser TPLA was performed with a proprietary 1064-nm continuous-wave diode laser. Baseline and 6-month follow-up assessments included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), prostate volume (PV), postvoid residual (PVR), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15). Safety outcomes were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

Results: EchoLaser TPLA significantly improved IPSS (median 22 to 6.5; p max (median 7.6 mL/s to 15.95 mL/s; p < 0.001) at 6 months. IIEF-15 scores remained stable, indicating preservation of erectile function. No intraoperative adverse events occurred; two mild periprocedural events (urinary tract infection, hematuria) were successfully managed conservatively. Nine of 10 catheter-dependent patients resumed normal voiding.

Conclusion: EchoLaser TPLA is an effective and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free