Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Xialiqi for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in a Randomized Trial

Yang F, Yang C, Wang X, Chen D, Wang Z, Wang J, Liang C, Hua L et al.

European urology open science, 2025

395 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background and objective: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men aged ≥50 yr. Xialiqi capsules are a traditional Chinese medicine mainly used for the treatment of moderate BPH-related LUTS.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of Xialiqi treatment for 8 wk in a cohort of 395 patients. Changes in BPH-related LUTS were assessed in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Irritative and obstructive IPSS subscores and secondary efficacy indicators, including quality of life (QoL) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores, were also assessed. Safety and tolerability were assessed in terms of adverse events (AEs) and serious AE.

Key findings and limitations: At the final time point of 8 wk, the least-squares treatment difference in IPSS between the Xialiqi and placebo groups was -2.33 (95% confidence interval -3.01 to -1.64). Analysis of covariance results suggested that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of interactions of subgroups or between parameter subgroups. Results for secondary efficacy measures, including Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index and QoL scores, revealed greater improvement with Xialiqi than with placebo. Safety results show that Xialiqi was well tolerated and AEs were mild. Limitations include the lack of long-term follow-up.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Xialiqi was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 395 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free