Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of High-Intensity, Focused Ultrasound for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment: A Forgotten Option?

Carlos A. García-Becerra, Verónica Soltero-Molinar, Maria I. Arias-Gallardo, Jesús E. Juárez-García, N. García, Leonardo Fernandez-Avila, Carlos M. García-Gutiérrez

Cureus, 2024

522 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a non-cancerous enlargement of prostate tissue, commonly affecting older men. This condition leads to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), which significantly affect the quality of life. Over time, extensive research has been conducted regarding BPH treatment, exploring various treatment options. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive treatment modality that has shown promise in initial studies. However, evidence regarding its long-term efficacy and safety remains inconclusive. This study evaluates HIFU's safety and efficacy for BPH treatment, identifying gaps for future research. The study conducted comprehensive searches across the PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, covering English-language articles from 1994 to 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies, with more than 10 patients utilizing ultrasound image-guided HIFU for BPH while excluding other HIFU modalities lacking ultrasound image guidance. Data extraction targeted primary outcomes (peak flow rate, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), postvoid residual volume) and secondary outcomes (treatment time, follow-up duration). Statistical analysis utilized a random effects model with heterogeneity assessed by I² statistics and the Q test, alongside subgroup analysis based on study design. The risk of bias assessment employed the Cochrane Collaboration tool for randomized controlled trials and the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 522 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free