Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy and safety of low-power versus high-power holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an updated meta-analysis

Muhammad Saeed Qazi, Sanya Ashraf, N. A. Rajpar, Shree Rath, Sabahat Ul Ain Munir Abbasi, Arisha Akhtar, Neha Malik, Muskan Kumari et al.

Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2026

394 participants

Abstract

Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is the gold-standard surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, irrespective of the prostate size. However, the optimal laser power setting remains uncertain. High-power systems (80–100 W) are commonly used in clinical practice, while emerging evidence suggests that low-power settings (24–50 W) may offer comparable efficacy with potential functional and safety advantages. Objective: To compare the perioperative, functional, and safety outcomes of low-power versus high-power HoLEP based on randomized controlled trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT comparing low-power (24–50 W) and high-power (80–100 W) HoLEP, searching four electronic databases from inception till April 2025. The data extracted on primary outcomes include International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual volume (PVR), quality of life (QoL), and Clavien–Dindo-graded complications. Secondary outcomes included operative efficiency metrics. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bios (RoB 2) tool. Results: Four trials (n = 394) were included. Low-power and high-power HoLEP showed similar IPSS improvement [MD: −0.30 (95% CI: −1.00 to 0.41)] and Qmax (0.30 ml/s, −0.42 to 1.01). Low-power HoLEP resulted in better QoL [MD: 0.20 (95% CI: 0.10–0.31] and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 394 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free