Evidence Hub

Preoperative Prostatic Artery Embolization Combined With Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Alone in Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hasan Alchalabi, Omar Amro, Rafie Ebrahimi Ghaei, C. Murphy, Muhammad Ali

Cureus, 2026

261 participants

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with large prostate volume presents substantial surgical challenges for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), encompassing heightened intraoperative haemorrhage risk, prolonged operative duration, and increased perioperative morbidity. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has been investigated as a minimally invasive adjunct to reduce prostatic vascularity prior to TURP, potentially optimising perioperative outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the comparative efficacy and safety of PAE combined with TURP (PAE+TURP) versus TURP alone in patients with large-volume BPH. PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through January 2026. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing PAE+TURP with TURP alone in large-volume BPH were eligible. The primary outcome was the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary outcomes comprised operative time, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and quality of life (QoL). Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were derived using random-effects models. Three studies (one RCT and two cohort studies) totalling 261 patients (88 PAE+TURP, 173 TURP alone) were included. PAE+TURP yielded significantly greater IPSS improvement than TURP alone (MD=-2.07; 95% CI: -3.15 to -0.99; p<0.001; I²=0%). Subgroup analyses stratified by follow-up duration demonstrated no significant between-group difference…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 261 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free