Evidence Hub

Acupuncture and moxibustion treating lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Zhe Chen, Tao Jiang, Yingying Peng, Xiaoyu Qiang, Feng-Wen Yang, Hai-Yin Hu, Chun-Xiang Liu, M. Lee

Acupuncture & Herbal Medicine, 2022

3,655 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) affect the quality of life of elderly individuals. Acupuncture and moxibustion are used in the clinic in China for improving LUTS symptoms due to BPH. However, there is no evidence to suggest which is the best option. We compared the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion to provide evidence for clinical decision-making. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang Data, and VIP databases were searched from inception to July 2020 to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture and moxibustion for LUTS due to BPH. Two researchers filtered studies and extracted the information independently. This study conducted a network meta-analysis using the Bayesian random method. The interventions ranking was evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: We finally included 40 studies comprising 10 treating therapies and 3655 patients with LUTS caused by BPH. In terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and quality of life, electroacupuncture (EA) (MD = −3.6, 95% credible interval [CrI] [−5.5, −1.8], very low certainty of evidence; MD = 2.2, 95% CrI [1.1, 3.3], low certainty of evidence; MD = −1.3, 95% CrI [−2.2, −0.43], very low certainty of evidence) may be consistently the optimal treatment compared with other interventions, with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,655 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free