PD56-04 comparative efficacy of novel surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis
Abstract
the older population but remained stable in the younger population. Among older patients, TURP was most commonly utilized (45%), followed by LP (30%), TUMT (17%), TUNA (5%), OP (2%) and TUIP (1%). Among younger patients, TURP (38%) was more closely followed by LP (31%) and then TUMT (18%), TUNA (8%), TUIP (3%) and OP (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 10-year span, older LUTS/BPH patients had a higher prevalence of surgical procedures than younger LUTS/BPH patients, and TURP and LP were the most commonly performed procedures. There was a dramatic reduction in surgical therapy for LUTS/BPH among older but not younger patients.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: facing age-related comorbidities and drug–drug interactions
- The Efficacy of Flogofilm® in the Treatment of Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis as an Adjuvant to Antibiotic Therapy: A Randomized Prospective Trial
- Inhibition of growth and contraction in human prostate stromal cells by silencing of NUAK1 and -2, and by the presumed NUAK inhibitors HTH01-015 and WZ4003
- Effectiveness and Safety of a New Nutrient Fixed Combination Containing Pollen Extract Plus Teupolioside, in the Management of LUTS in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy: A Pilot Study
- Extract from Cucurbita pepo improves BPH symptoms without affecting sexual function: a 24-month noninterventional study
- Aquablation vs. holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 150-patients prospective comparative multicenter study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.