Evidence Hub

(212) Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in the Geriatric Population: A Systematic Review

A. Abid, M. Babar, H. Piperdi, J. Loloi, M. Zhu, U. Azhar, P. Maria, A. Small

Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2024

2,911 participants

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an extremely common disease in aging men and can lead to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and complications. While the initial management of BPH includes behavioral modifications and pharmacologic therapies, older patients have increased susceptibility to adverse events (AEs) and therefore have decreased compliance. Consequently, geriatric patients may benefit from minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) as treatment alternatives for BPH. Currently, there is no systematic review describing MISTs outcomes in specifically older populations.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of MISTs in geriatric patients with BPH.

PubMed/MEDLINE database was systematically searched for relevant articles in the English language through June 24, 2023. Studies that evaluated surgical and/or urinary outcomes of MISTs in geriatric patients (≥65 years of age) were deemed eligible. Studies were included if there was separate reporting for age subgroups ≥65 years, if mean age minus SD was ≥65 years, or if median age minus Q1 was ≥65 years. Studies with patients with catheter dependent urinary retention were not excluded.

A total of 263 studies were screened, of which 22 (N=2,911 patients) met inclusion. Of the 22 studies, 3 evaluated PAE, 1 evaluated Rezum, 7 evaluated GreenLight, 4 evaluated HoLEP, 4 evaluated ThuLEP, 1 evaluated DiLEP, 1 evaluated Aquablation, and 1 evaluated both PAE + Rezum. The Rezum study and the PAE + Rezum study only…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,911 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free