Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of Serenoa repens in benign prostatic disorders: a systematic review of recent clinical evidence

I. Schwartzmann, Anna Redondo, A. Farré, P. Izquierdo, E. Moncada, M. Montlleó, Yesica Y. Quiroz, Alberto Breda et al.

Drugs in Context, 2026

3,000 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

This systematic review assessed the potential effectiveness and safety of Serenoa repens (saw palmetto) for benign prostatic disorders, mainly benign prostatic hyperplasia and associated lower urinary tract symptoms. Following PRISMA guidance (PROSPERO: CRD420251032255), we searched PubMed, Cochrane and ScienceDirect for human studies from January 2020 to May 2025. Sixteen studies (>3000 participants) met criteria, including randomized trials, observational cohorts, a post hoc analysis, an open-label comparative study and a pharmacovigilance analysis. Overall, S. repens was associated with improvements in symptom severity (International Prostate Symptom Score) in several trials, with variable effects on urinary flow, post-void residual volume, and patient-reported quality of life. Signals of benefit appeared more consistently with hexanic lipidosterolic extracts and β-sitosterol-enriched preparations, and some real-world and head-to-head comparisons suggested outcomes comparable to alpha-blockers with fewer adverse events. Combination therapy, especially with the addition of alpha-blockers, showed larger symptom reductions in select populations, particularly with more pronounced baseline symptoms or prostatic inflammation. However, heterogeneity in extract formulations, dosing, study design, and outcome reporting limited cross-study comparability. Safety findings were generally favourable, with mostly mild gastrointestinal events and fewer sexual adverse effects than…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free