Evidence Hub

Modern surgical techniques for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

Adam Andrzejewski, Dominika Raether, Dominika Julia Kozdroń, Michalina Weronika Nieścioruk, Paulina Szczepańska, Jacek Kowalski, Dominika Dutkiewicz, Alia Echtay Yarbou et al.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2026

Abstract

Aims: To systematically review randomized evidence on modern minimally invasive and endoscopic techniques for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), focusing on clinical efficacy, safety, perioperative outcomes, preservation of sexual/ejaculatory function, and durability compared with TURP or sham.

Methods: We conducted a systematic PubMed search (2020–2025) using predefined terms for BPH surgery and randomized controlled trials. Main findings from eligible articles were summarized.

Results: The review identified 41 randomized controlled trials evaluating nine modern techniques (endoscopic enucleation, laser vaporization, Aquablation, Rezūm water vapor thermal therapy, prostatic urethral lift/PUL, transperineal laser ablation/TPLA, temporary nitinol device/iTind, drug-coated balloon/Optilume, and prostatic artery embolisation/PAE), comprising thousands of men with moderate-to-severe LUTS. Endoscopic enucleation and Aquablation showed durable, TURP-like or superior improvements in IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR, particularly in large prostates (>80 mL), with better perioperative outcomes. Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) provided meaningful symptom relief and excellent preservation of sexual/ejaculatory function, while PAE had lower objective efficacy and higher reintervention rates. Serious complications were uncommon across all techniques.

Conclusions: Current evidence supports these modern techniques as valuable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free