Evidence Hub

Transurethral anatomical enucleation of the prostate using a 1470-nm diode laser (DiLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Hao Liu, Xin Wang, Xue-min Shi

Lasers in Medical Science, 2026

121 participants

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of transurethral anatomical enucleation using a 1470-nm diode laser (DiLEP) (1470 nm DiLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in improving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with large-volume benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). In this prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial, a total of 121 patients with large-volume BPO (> 90 ml) who visited xx Hospital between June 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned using a random number table to the 1470 nm DiLEP group (n = 61) or the TURP group (n = 60). Perioperative variables, as well as functional outcomes and complications at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, were compared between the two groups. No statistically significant differences existed between groups at baseline for age, prostate volume, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), or quality of life (QoL) scores (P > 0.05). The 1470 nm DiLEP group demonstrated significantly shorter operative time, smaller hemoglobin decrease, lower sodium decrease, shorter catheterization duration, and shorter hospitalization compared to the TURP group (P 0.05). However, the incidence of retrograde ejaculation at 6 and 12 months postoperatively was significantly lower in the 1470 nm DiLEP group compared to the TURP group, while IIEF-5 scores were markedly improved (P < 0.05). 1470 nm DiLEP and TURP demonstrate comparable efficacy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 121 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free