Evidence Hub

PD24-03 efficacy and safety of afalaza in MEN with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia at risk of progression: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

A. Vinarov, D. Pushkar, L. Spivak

Journal of Urology, 2019

249 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a prevalent and progressive condition in aging men. To investigate the efficacy and safety of Afalaza in men with BPH at risk of progression the multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was performed. Derived by technological treatment of antibodies to prostate-specific antigen and endothelial NO synthase Afalaza was previously proved to modulate its molecular targets. METHODS: 249 patients of 45-60 years old with BPH and moderate LUTS, total prostate volume (TPV) ≥ 30 cm3, maximum urine flow rate (Qmax) of 10-15 ml/s, and serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA) <4 ng/ml were randomly assigned to receive either Afalaza (n=125) or placebo (n=124) for 12 months. Interactive voice/web response randomization system based on a random number generator was used for patients` randomization. Changes in BPH/LUTS symptoms (according to the International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]), Qmax, TPV, PSA, BPH clinical progression, occurrence of acute urinary retention (AUR) events or BPH-related surgery were estimated as the study endpoints. The study was conducted in accordance with the all ethic principles and was approved by the National Ethics Committee. RESULTS: IPSS mean (±standard deviation) change was -3.7±3.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.3 to -3.2) after 12 months of Afalaza (vs. -2.9±2.4; 95% CI -3.3 to -2.4 in placebo; p=0.02).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 249 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free