Evidence Hub

Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with acute urinary retention associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Zheng-Yong Yuan, Changxiao He, Shi-Bing Yan, Cai-Wen Wu

Scandinavian journal of urology, 2014

845 participants · 20 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective.The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Material and methods. In total, 845 consecutive patients with their first episode of spontaneous AUR associated with BPH were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial. They were randomly assigned to be given either pharmacological treatment combined with bladder training or pharmacological treatment (tamsulosin 0.2 mg and finasteride 5 mg once daily) with free drainage of urinary catheter for 7 days, and a trial without catheter (TWOC) was performed. Data on patients' baseline demographics, history of BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score, prostate size, serum prostate-specific antigen, intravesical prostatic protrusion, TWOC success rates and related complications were collected and statistically analysed. Results.The two groups of spontaneous AUR patients with BPH were given pharmacological treatment combined with bladder training before catheter removal (n = 440) or pharmacological treatment alone (n = 405) for 7 days. All 845 patients underwent a first TWOC with an overall success rate of 66.9% after first 7 days' catheterization; TWOC was successful in 65.2% of cases in the intervention group and 68.6% in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in TWOC success rate between the two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 845 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free