Evidence Hub

Safety and Efficacy of Vibegron in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms on Pharmacotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From the 28-Week Open-Label COURAGE Extension Trial Completing the 52-Week Phase 3 Evaluation

David Staskin, Janet Owens-Grillo, Elizabeth Thomas, Kenneth M. Peters, E. Rovner, Salim Mujais

JU Open Plus, 2026

276 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

In the 24-week, phase 3 COURAGE trial, vibegron was associated with significant improvements vs placebo in all primary and key secondary efficacy end points and was well tolerated in men with overactive bladder (OAB) on pharmacotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Safety and efficacy of vibegron were evaluated in a 28-week open-label extension study.

Participants who completed COURAGE received once-daily vibegron 75 mg for 28 additional weeks in the extension study. The primary outcome was safety (adverse events [AEs], clinical laboratory assessments, vital signs, postvoid residual urine volume [PVR], and International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]-total score). Secondary outcomes were change from baseline to week 52 in mean daily micturitions, urgency episodes, nocturia episodes, urge urinary incontinence episodes, IPSS-storage score, and volume voided per micturition. Exploratory outcomes included change from baseline to week 52 in the OAB-questionnaire and Patient Global Impression scales.

Overall, 276 participants enrolled (vibegron, n = 142 [52-week cohort]; placebo, n = 134 [28-week cohort]); 90.6% completed the extension, with 9 participants discontinuing vibegron because of AEs. In the 52-week cohort, AE incidences were similar to double-blind treatment; there were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters, vital signs or PVR, and median IPSS-total score decreased from baseline to week 52. Improvements in all secondary and exploratory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 276 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free