Evidence Hub

Short- to Mid-term Safety and Efficacy of Prostatic Artery Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia – A Single-center Experience

Sudhanshu Goyal, R. Parakh, Tarun Grover, V. Sheorain

Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2025

17 participants

Abstract

To assess the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) using n-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

It is retrospective analysis of 17 consecutive patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent PAE using n-BCA at the Department of Peripheral Vascular and Endovascular Sciences, Medanta – The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, between January 2020 and December 2023.

The primary outcome assessed was improvement in the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) from baseline to 12 months. The secondary outcomes assessed were improvements in IPSS-associated quality-of-life score (IPSS-QoL), maximum flow rate on uroflowmetry (Qmax), prostate gland volume (PGV), residual void volume (RVV), and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Adverse events that occurred at any time during the 12-month follow-up were reported according to the Clavien−Dindo grading system.

A total of 17 patients underwent PAE with n-BCA with 100% technical success. There were statistically significant improvements from baseline to 12 months for the IPSS (from 18.41 to 6.35, P < 0.001), IPSS-QoL (from 4.94 to 1.76, P < 0.001), Qmax (from 6.05 to 14.97, P < 0.001), RVV (from 179.7 to 44.7, P < 0.001), PSA level (from 4.06 to 2.06, P < 0.001), and PGV (from 72.2 to 30.5, P < 0.001). There were no major adverse events.

The findings support the safety of PAE using n-BCA, with excellent technical and mid-term clinical outcomes. Randomized trials with longer…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free