Evidence Hub

The double-decking method for rezūm water vapor therapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia: volumetric, functional, and dosimetric outcomes

Ming-Jui Tseng, Ka-Lun Lo, Chi-Hsiang Wu, Shih-Ying Lin, Chih-Jen Wang, Chen-Yueh Wen

BMC Urology, 2026

26 participants

Abstract

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) significantly impact quality of life in aging men. Conventional Rezūm water vapor therapy consistently achieves only a modest 25–30% prostate volume reduction, leaving a clinically meaningful therapeutic gap—particularly for larger glands where single-plane periurethral injection fails to achieve adequate thermal coverage of the entire transition zone.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dual-layered injection strategy (“Double-decking method”) for Rezūm water vapor therapy, targeting a treatment cycles per unit prostate volume (CPV) > 0.15, in patients with symptomatic BPH.

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients treated at a single institution.

We enrolled 26 consecutive patients with symptomatic BPH (April 2025–December 2025) who underwent Rezūm therapy using the “Double-decking method,” in which two sequential injections were performed within each field-of-view—one targeting the anterior and one the posterior aspect of the transition zone—targeting a CPV > 0.15. The primary endpoint was prostate volume (PV) reduction at 3 months; secondary endpoints included IPSS, Qmax, post-void residual (PVR), ejaculatory function assessed by the MSHQ-EjD, and erectile function assessed by the IIEF-5.

The mean CPV was 0.19. Total prostate volume decreased by 50.7% (

p

< 0.001). Qmax improved by + 203.5% (

p

< 0.001), PVR decreased by 95.2% (

p

< 0.001),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 26 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free