Evidence Hub

Efficacy of symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-29 questionnaire in assessing alpha-blocker treatment response in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective, multicenter, cohort study

Arikan Ozgur, K. Ozgur, A. Gurkan, Ucar Taha, Parpucu Alihan, I. Ayberk, C. Caglar, Culpan Meftun et al.

Urology, 2024

135 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-29 questionnaire (LURN SI-29) in assessing alpha-blocker treatment response in patients with LUTS.

METHODS

This prospective, non-randomised, multicentre trial included males with LUTS who visited urology outpatient clinics between January and April 2023. The most employed LUTS questionnaire is the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), while the LURN SI-29 was also utilised. Prospective monitoring comprised the completion of IPSS and LURN SI-29 forms, uroflowmetry, and residual urine assessment prior to the initiation of alpha-blocker therapy and at the conclusion of the first month of treatment.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 135 patients. There was a significant enhancement in the mean IPSS, which decreased from 18.4 to 11.2 (p=0.001). Furthermore, the mean LURN SI-29 score exhibited a significant decline, from 37.02 to 22.4 (p=0.001). The improvement in IPSS and LURN SI-29 scores was 67.1%±54.3% and 64.2%±34.1%, respectively. Additionally, these improvements were found to be correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.79, R2=0.63, p=0.001). The mean Qmax increased from 10.3 ml/s to 11.9 ml/s (p=0.001). No significant difference was identified between alpha-blocker types.

CONCLUSION

A strong correlation was observed between LURN SI-29 and IPSS among patients with LUTS who were initiated on alpha-blocker therapy. LURN-SI-29 may be employed for the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 135 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free