Evidence Hub

I-Tind for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: Mid-term outcomes from a multicenter cohort

M. Dimitri, A. Calarco, Beatrice Filippi, Pietro Viscuso, Vincenzo Asero, G. Mantica, Francesca Ambrosini, G. Spena et al.

Urologiâ, 2025

120 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men, significantly impacting quality of life. Although pharmacological therapies, especially alpha-blockers, are the standard first-line treatment, their long-term adherence is limited by side effects and insufficient symptom control. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the surgical gold standard but is associated with notable morbidity, prompting interest in minimally invasive alternatives. The temporary implantable nitinol device (I-Tind) offers a tissue-sparing approach designed to remodel the prostatic urethra and relieve LUTS without compromising sexual function. This multicenter prospective study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and functional outcomes of I-Tind in 120 patients with symptomatic BPH unresponsive to alpha-blockers, treated between 2019 and 2023. Follow-up assessments were done at 3, 6, and 12 months. The study showed significant improvements in urinary flow and symptom scores. Mean Qmax improved from 7.6 to 15.7 mL/s, and mean IPSS decreased from 21.5 to 9.7 at 12 month-follow-up (p < 0.001). Quality of life measures also improved, and sexual and ejaculatory functions were fully preserved. The procedure was well-tolerated, with all implants successfully retrieved after a mean of 6 days and a low complication rate. I-Tind appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive option for selected BPH patients, combining symptom relief with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free