Evidence Hub

Clinical and radiographic intersection of cerebral amyloid angiopathy with euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis in the development of transient focal neurologic deficits: case report

Aboubechara JP, Saggio M, Campa O, Oguz KK, Nguyen I

Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2025

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe a case of transient neurologic deficits triggered by euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in brain tissue at risk due to heavy cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) microbleed burden, while demonstrating the rare imaging finding of reversible T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) subcortical hypointensity.

Methods: We present the clinical course, laboratory findings, and neuroimaging features of an 81-year-old man who presented with acute altered mental status and transient focal neurologic deficits.

Results: The patient presented with encephalopathy, headache, left hemianopsia, left sensory neglect, and mild left upper extremity weakness. Laboratory examination showed euglycemic DKA. Brain MRI revealed findings consistent with probable CAA according to Boston Criteria 2.0, including innumerable cortical microbleeds predominantly in the right temporo-parieto-occipital lobes, with superimposed diffuse T2 FLAIR-weighted hypointensity in this region.

Discussion: Reversible T2 FLAIR hypointensity has been described in hyperglycemia-associated syndromes. In this case, T2 FLAIR hypointensity likely represented metabolic dysregulation that triggered cortical dysfunction within brain regions at risk due to heavy CAA-related microbleed burden. We speculate that a common pathway for the development of the patient's transient deficits resulted from cortical spreading depolarization (CSD), which has been associated with both CAA and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free