Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy and safety of B-TUVP vs. B-TURP for benign prostatic hyperplasia at a tertiary centre in eastern Nepal

Amit Kumar Shah, Sumita Verma, S. Kharel, Deepak Pun, Bashu Dev Baskota

Journal of Chitwan Medical College, 2026

400 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) is an established surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Bipolar transurethral vaporization (B-TUVP) of the prostate using a button electrode has emerged as an alternative with potential safety advantages. This study compared the efficacy and safety of B-TUVP versus B-TURP in a tertiary centre in eastern Nepal.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of BPH treated between Jan 2021 and Dec 2024 at B and C Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Birtamod, Nepal, was conducted. Ethical approval was obtained. Patients were categorized into B-TUVP and B-TURP groups. Variables included operative time, irrigation time, haemoglobin drop, hospital stay, catheterization duration, IPSS, Qmax, QOL, and PVRV. Follow-up was at 4, 8, 12, and 24 months. Data analysis was done by SPSS version 29. A p≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 400 patients (B-TUVP n=200, B-TURP n=200) were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. B-TUVP had longer operative time (60.94±18.64 vs 49.85±9.35 min, p=0.001) but shorter postoperative irrigation time (11.03±0.82 vs 14.99±2.02 h, p=0.001), less haemoglobin drop (0.74±0.14 vs 0.99±0.11 g/dL, p=0.001), shorter hospital stay (2.93±0.83 vs 3.50±1.10 days, p=0.001) and catheterization duration (3.03±0.84 vs 3.99±1.35 days, p=0.001). IPSS and Qmax improved significantly in both groups, with B-TURP showing better early outcomes.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 400 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free