Evidence Hub

Rezūm therapy: Outcomes of symptom relief and quality of life in benign prostatic obstruction with three-year followup

Mario Henrique Bitar Siqueira, S. Shprits, O. Buksh, N. Bhojani, Bilal Chughtai, K. Zorn, L. Cindolo, G. Ferrari et al.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2025

712 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of Rezūm water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The objective was to assess the durability of symptom relief and sustained LUTS improvement over a three-year followup in a real-world, multicenter cohort.

METHODS

A prospective registry was maintained at two high-volume international centers for men undergoing Rezūm therapy between April 2019 and October 2024. All participants had baseline clinical data recorded, including BPH history, uroflowmetry parameters (peak flow rate [Qmax] and postvoid residual [PVR]), and validated questionnaires (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], IPSS quality of life [QoL], BPH Impact Index [BPHII], International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-15], and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire for Ejaculatory Dysfunction [MSHQ-EjD]).

RESULTS

A total of 712 men with at least one year of followup were analyzed. The mean age was 67.2 years (stanadrad deviation [SD] 8.9), and the average baseline prostate volume was 74.1 cc (SD 34.4). Mean IPSS scores improved from 22 at baseline to 9.8 at 36 months. IPSS QoL scores improved from 4.5 to 1.9. Qmax increased from 8.6 ml/s at baseline to 15 ml/s at 24 months and 12.1 ml/s at 36 months. PVR decreased from 134.9 ml to 38.5 ml. There were no significant changes in IIEF or MSHQ-EjD domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezūm WVTT provides significant, durable symptom…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 712 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free