Evidence Hub

A novel metal-free sling approach for benign prostatic hyperplasia: early results of the Progator procedure with high ejaculatory preservation

Zhao Luo, D. Choi, S. Kam, Chao Niu, Tae Hyo Kim, Chang-Min Lee, Yu Seob Shin, Kisoo Lee

Translational Andrology and Urology, 2023

94 participants

Abstract

Background Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men and frequently leads to bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Current minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) have improved safety but often involve metal implants or variable ejaculatory preservation. This study aims to evaluate the preliminary safety and efficacy of the Progator procedure, a novel metal-free mechanical MIST for BPH, which uses a transurethral sling with dynamic tension adjustment to compress enlarged prostate lobes. Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 94 patients with moderate-to-severe BPH who underwent the Progator procedure between January and May 2025. Outcome measures included changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual (PVR) volume, and ejaculatory function at 12 weeks postoperatively. Statistical analyses used paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for continuous variables and McNemar’s test for categorical variables, with significance set at P<0.05. Results Significant improvements were observed in all primary outcomes. Mean total IPSS decreased from 29.0 to 14.0 (−55.0%; P<0.001), and Qmax increased from 11.8 to 18.5 mL/s (+57.0%; P<0.001). Ejaculatory function was preserved in 89.4% of patients. No serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) were documented. Conclusions The Progator procedure demonstrates significant short-term…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 94 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free