Evidence Hub

The protective role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in preventing colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Carolyn M. Cullinane, Allan S. Brett, Liam Devane, Philip McCullough, Fiachra Cooke, Paul Neary

Colorectal Disease, 2023

995 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aim Inflammatory cells within the tumour microenvironment are the driving forces behind colorectal cancer (CRC) tumourigenesis. Understanding the different pathways involved in CRC carcinogenesis paves the way for effective repurposing of drugs for cancer prevention. Emerging data from preclinical and clinical studies suggest that, due to their antiproliferative and anti‐inflammatory properties, phosphodiesterase‐5 inhibitors (PDE5i) might have an anticancer effect. The aim of this study was to clarify through systematic review and meta‐analysis of published peer‐reviewed studies whether an association exists between PDE5i use and CRC risk. Method This study was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. Prospective registration was performed on PROSPERO (CRD42022372925). A systematic review was performed for studies reporting CRC and advanced colorectal polyp incidence in PDE5i ‘ever‐users’ and PDE5i ‘never‐users’. Meta‐analysis was performed using RevMan version 5. Results Four observational cohort studies and two case–control studies, comprising 995 242 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 347 126 were PDE5i ever‐users. Patients who were PDE5i ever‐users had a significantly lower incidence of CRC or advanced colorectal polyps than never‐users (OR 0.88, CI 0.79–0.98, p = 0.02). To examine the primary preventative role of PDE5i, subgroup analysis of four studies including patients without a previous…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 995 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free