Evidence Hub

Subintimal excimer laser coronary atherectomy (S-ELCA) as a bail-out for device-uncrossable chronic total occlusion: case report

Elsherif A, Fawzy A, Khattak S, Shahid F, Khan SQ

European heart journal. Case reports, 2026

Abstract

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) that cannot be crossed with balloons or microcatheters despite successful guidewire passage represent one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) is an established adjunct for device-uncrossable lesions; however, the safety of its application within the subintimal space remains limited.

Case summary: A 67-year-old male with a complex cardiac history, including prior recurrent interventions and coronary artery bypass grafting, was referred for staged PCI of a right coronary artery CTO because of refractory angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III). Following successful antegrade subintimal wire tracking and re-entry using a Stingray balloon, multiple ultra-low-profile balloons and dedicated microcatheters failed to traverse the subintimal-to-true-lumen transition. A 0.9-mm ELCA catheter at 80 mJ/mm2 and 80 Hz was used in the subintimal space without saline flush, successfully creating a traversable channel. Complete revascularization was achieved using six overlapping drug-eluting stents, optimized with intravascular ultrasound guidance. At two-year follow-up, repeat intravascular ultrasound demonstrated vascular healing at the subintimal-re-entry interface.

Discussion: This case demonstrates the potential safety and feasibility of subintimal ELCA (SELCA) as a bail-out for device-uncrossable lesions during antegrade dissection re-entry of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free