Evidence Hub

Diagnostic challenges of clinically significant portal hypertension in geriatric metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: A case report

Akbar FN, Darnindro N, Wardhani AA, Choirida SR, Saphira SN, Ismed G, Kshanti IAM, Mustika S et al.

World journal of hepatology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) may progress to cirrhosis and lead to serious complications. Lipid accumulation, hepatocellular ballooning, and sinusoidal endothelial dysfunction increase intrahepatic vascular resistance, resulting in early clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Although hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) remains the gold standard, decompensated cirrhosis may yield deceptively low values. Transient elastography and platelet count provide supportive diagnostic evidence, yet obesity can overestimate disease severity. This report highlights the diagnostic challenge of CSPH, especially MAFLD in geriatric patients.

Case summary: A 78-year-old woman with class I obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia presented with hematemesis and melena for a three-day period. A prior computed tomography scan revealed moderate diffuse hepatic steatosis, splenic vein dilatation, and splenomegaly. On admission, she presented with pallor, epigastric tenderness, splenomegaly, and mild ascites. Laboratory findings showed anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperglycemia. Abdominal ultrasound confirmed chronic liver disease with splenomegaly. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy demonstrated grade II-III esophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy. Noninvasive fibrosis assessments (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score, aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index, fibrosis-4 index, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free