Evidence Hub

When Type 2 Diabetes Isn't Type 2: Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in a Lean, Highly Physically Active Adult

Saiprasad S, Swamy N

Cureus, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is frequently misclassified as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), leading to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal management. We report a lean, highly physically active adult engaged in sustained, high-intensity physical activity as part of his occupation, in his early 70s, with a 30-year history of presumed T2DM who was referred for endocrine evaluation because of persistent glycemic instability despite insulin therapy. He reported frequent symptomatic episodes of both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, resulting in significant occupational stress, as maintenance of physical fitness and body weight was essential for continued employment. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values remained persistently elevated, ranging from 7.8% to 9.6% (reference range: 3.8%-5.6%), with marked glycemic variability and failure to achieve stable control. Given his low body mass index (BMI) of 20 kg/m² (reference range: 18.5-24.9 kg/m²) and pronounced glucose fluctuations, evaluation for autoimmune diabetes was pursued. Laboratory testing demonstrated markedly elevated glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) antibodies (204 IU/mL; reference range <5 IU/mL) and a low C-peptide level (0.54 ng/mL; reference range 1.10-5.50 ng/mL), confirming LADA with advanced beta-cell failure. Management was transitioned from empiric multiple daily insulin injections to a tubeless automated insulin delivery (AID) system integrated with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Over longitudinal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free