Evidence Hub

Efficacy of embolic microspheres of different sizes for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Correlation with serum prostate-specific antigen levels

Chenyang Zhang, Weixing Mo, Jian-Xia Xu, Xiaozhong Zheng, Qinpan Rao, Tian-Yu Ke, Xiaoshan Huang, J. Xiang et al.

Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology, 2025

80 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in aging men that can significantly impact quality of life. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of super-selective PAE using microspheres of different sizes on BPH patients and investigate its correlation with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expression. Methods: A prospective, single-blind randomized study was performed on 80 eligible patients treated between January 2020 and October 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to Group A (100 – 300 μm microspheres) or Group B (300 – 500 μm microspheres), with 40 patients each. Follow-ups were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months post-embolization using ultrasound and/or computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, alongside PSA testing. Data collection covered prostate volume (PV), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual (PVR), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), clinical symptoms, obstruction relief, and PSA levels. Results: Significant improvements were observed in all parameters (IPSS, QoL, PV, PVR, and Qmax) at each follow-up point (all p<0.05). Group A showed superior outcomes at 6 months in both subjective (IPSS, QoL) and objective (PV, PVR, Qmax, PSA) parameters (all p<0.05). The PSA–PV correlation demonstrated a dose-response relationship. Minor complications occurred in Group A (20.0%) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free