Evidence Hub

Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial

Marc R. Sapoval, Nicolas Thiounn, A. Descazeaud, Carole Déan, A. Ruffion, Gaële Pagnoux, Ricardo Codas Duarte, G. Robert et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 2023

44 participants · 53 citations

Abstract

Background: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient’s symptoms improvement after PAE and medical treatment. Methods: A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French hospitals. Patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to BPH ≥50 ml resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to PAE or Combined Therapy ([CT], oral dutasteride 0·5 mg / tamsulosin hydrochloride 0·4 mg per day). Randomisation was stratified by centre, International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and prostate volume with a minimisation procedure to ensure balanced allocation. The primary outcome was the 9-month change in IPSS. Primary and safety analysis were done according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle among patients with an evaluable primary outcome (modified ITT). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869971. Findings: Ninety patients were randomised from September 2016 to February 2020, and 44 and 43 patients assessed for primary endpoint in PAE and CT groups respectively. The 9-month change of IPSS was -10·0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -11·8 to -8·3) and -5·7 (95% CI: -7·5 to -3·8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. This reduction was significantly greater in the PAE group than in the CT group (-4·4 [95% CI: -6·9 to -1·9], P=0·0008). The IIEF-15 score change was 8·2 (95% CI: 2·9 to 13·5) and -2·8 (95% CI: -8·4 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free