Evidence Hub

Analysis of frailty status and associated factors in elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Qian Wang, Mengyuan Guo, Mengnan Chen, YuSheng Chen, 韩惠平

Journal of Men s Health, 2026

137 participants

Abstract

Background: To explore the current status of frailty in elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and analyze the influencing factors. Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design, in which we selected 220 inpatients aged >60 years who were admitted to the Departments of Geriatrics and Urology and diagnosed with BPH. Participants were categorized into a non-frail (normal) group (n = 83) and a frail group (n = 137) according to the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). General characteristics were collected, and the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and a reverse questionnaire survey were administered. Univariate analysis, correlation analysis, and binary logistic regression were conducted to identify factors associated with frailty in elderly BPH patients. Results: Univariate analysis showed that the main factors influencing frailty in elderly BPH patients were age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), disease duration, alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI), personal monthly income, number of chronic diseases, MNA-SF score, and MoCA score (all p < 0.05). The total TFI score was negatively correlated with both MNA-SF (r = −0.297) and MoCA (r = −0.209), and these correlations were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the binary logistic regression analysis, IPSS score, disease duration, alcohol consumption, number of chronic diseases, and MNA-SF score emerged as the main factors associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 137 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free