Evidence Hub

Predictors and predictive performance of immune–inflammation indices for symptom severity in benign prostatic hyperplasia

Altaseb Beyene Kassaw, Seid Mohammed Abdu, Gashaw Abebe

Scientific Reports, 2025

232 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Although the relatively unchanging consequences of age and genetic factors significantly contribute to the development and progression of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), numerous modifiable factors play a role in preventing progression or alleviating symptoms. Identifying predictors of symptom severity and objective biomarkers is beneficial for effective management. This study aimed to determine the predictors of BPH symptom severity and assess the predictive performance of hematologically derived inflammatory markers in patients attending Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted from August to October 2024. Data was collected through face-to-face interviews performed by well-trained health professionals using the KoboCollect application. STATA version 17 was utilized for statistical data analysis. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify predictors of BPH severity, with a p-value of 564.92 × 10³ (AOR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.10-7.98), PII > 273.3 × 10⁶ (AOR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.04-5.86), and NLR ≥ 1.368 (AOR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.01-8.14)] were significantly associated with severe BPH symptoms (p-value < 0.05). In ROC analysis, SII exhibited the highest predictive performance for severe symptoms with an AUC of 0.736 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.801); optimal cut-off: 564.92 × 10³; specificity - 72%, sensitivity - 69%; PII demonstrated similar performance with an AUC of 0.729 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.796);…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 232 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free