Clinical efficacy of prostatic apex preservation vs. the non‑preserving method in the management of BPH: A systematic review and meta‑analysis
Abstract
. The present study was carried out to determine the efficacy of the apex preservation technique in the manage‑ ment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) complications following surgery. For this purpose, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases were widely searched for controlled trials published up to 2025. The ROBINS‑I tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test were applied for publication bias in the present study. GRADEpro was used to assess the quality of evidence. The results revealed that the surgery duration of the preserving technique was significantly shorter [mean difference (MD), ‑9.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), ‑13.91 to ‑5.73; P<0.00001]. The preserving technique method was associated with a lower incontinence rate (relative risk, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.46; P=0.0004). Blood loss in the preserving technique group was also less (MD, ‑65.37; 95% CI, ‑121.97 to ‑8.77; P=0.02). On the whole, as demonstrated herein, preserving the prostatic apex is also more time‑efficient, leading to a markedly lower risk of developing complications such as blood loss and quicker urinary continence recovery following catheter removal. This leads to improved patient satisfaction, while maintaining similar International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life and peak urinary flow rate values. Therefore, further research is required in order to fully determine the clinical effects of prostatic…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Treatment of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: facing age-related comorbidities and drug–drug interactions
- The Efficacy of Flogofilm® in the Treatment of Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis as an Adjuvant to Antibiotic Therapy: A Randomized Prospective Trial
- Inhibition of growth and contraction in human prostate stromal cells by silencing of NUAK1 and -2, and by the presumed NUAK inhibitors HTH01-015 and WZ4003
- Effectiveness and Safety of a New Nutrient Fixed Combination Containing Pollen Extract Plus Teupolioside, in the Management of LUTS in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy: A Pilot Study
- Extract from Cucurbita pepo improves BPH symptoms without affecting sexual function: a 24-month noninterventional study
- Aquablation vs. holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 150-patients prospective comparative multicenter study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.