Evidence Hub

The efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing bleeding during transurethral resection of prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A. Mustafa, N. Abdelgadim, Nasreldeen Mohamed, M. Abdelsadig, M. Nouraldaem, Insaf Hassan Ahmed Mohammed, Amel Eltahir Banaga Ahmed, S. Farag et al.

Urological Science, 2026

1,127 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the standard surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Perioperative bleeding is a major concern and may lead to blood transfusion, prolonged catheterization, and extended hospital stay. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, has been used to reduce surgical bleeding; however, its efficacy in TURP remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TXA in reducing perioperative bleeding and improving operative outcomes in patients undergoing TURP.

A systematic search of multiple electronic databases was conducted to identify controlled trials comparing TXA with placebo or no intervention in patients undergoing TURP. Eligible studies were required to report hemoglobin change as the primary outcome. Data were pooled using mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Thirteen studies comprising 1127 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly smaller decline in hemoglobin levels in the TXA group compared with control (MD, −0.62; 95% CI, −0.93 to −0.32;

P

< .0001). TXA significantly reduced operative blood loss (MD, −104.35 mL; 95% CI, −163.35 to −45.41;

P

= .0005), shortened operative time (MD, −6.95 minutes, 95% CI, −11.62 to −2.27;

P

= .004), and decreased catheterization duration (MD, −0.18 days; 95% CI, −0.36 to −0.01;

P

= 0.04).

TXA appears to significantly reduce perioperative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,127 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free