Evidence Hub

GreenLight photoselective laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for large prostates: systematic review and meta-analysis

B. Porto, Bianca C. Benedicto, Beatriz T. Constantinou, N. C. Hobaica, C. C. Passerotti, Richard Dobrucki de Lima, Rodrigo A. S. Sanderberg, E. Artifon et al.

Translational Andrology and Urology, 2025

159 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) stands as a primary surgical intervention for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), although laser techniques, notably photoselective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP), are gaining traction. Previous studies have already assessed the efficacy of TURP and PVP, although with small prostates (<70 mL). Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of PVP compared to TURP in the male BPH population with large prostates (≥70 mL). Methods A systematic review was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Studies comparing PVP to TURP in male BPH patients were included. Our primary outcome was the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary outcomes encompassed maximum urinary flow rate (Qmáx), postvoid residual volume (Vres), operative time, catheterization time, postoperative hospital stay and complications. To assess the risk of bias we used Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomized studies, and risk of bias 2 tool (Cochrane) (RoB2) for the randomized. Results Three articles encompassing 159 patients each in the PVP and TURP groups were included. Our analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in IPSS score between PVP and TURP [mean difference (MD) 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52 to 3.64; P=0.14; I2=85%]. TURP demonstrated a reduced operative time (MD 30.35; 95% CI: 11.26 to 49.44;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 159 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free