Evidence Hub

Which improvements does Rezum bring to BPH management? A network meta-analysis and comparison of water vapor therapy and conduction ablation techniques

Yun-Jung Yang, Eun-Jung Yang, T. T. Nguyen, T. Kato, Se-Young Choi

Minerva urology and nephrology, 2025

1,622 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Rezum water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum) and compared them with those of traditional conduction ablation methods for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive review of studies from the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases was performed. Only randomized clinical trials that reported the outcomes of thermal ablation treatments, including transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), and Rezum, were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare these treatments.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Sixteen studies comprising 1622 patients were included. Rezum did not show efficacy superior to that of traditional conduction ablation methods in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. The incidence of acute urinary retention associated with Rezum was similar to that associated with other conduction ablation methods of TUMT and TUNA and transurethral resection of the prostate. Regarding ejaculatory dysfunction, Rezum resulted in outcomes comparable to those of sham treatment. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, Rezum resulted in the lowest incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezum provides functional outcomes of urinary symptoms that are comparable to those of conduction ablation therapies. Notably, among the minimally…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,622 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free