Evidence Hub

The efficacy and optimal timing of pelvic floor muscle training for post‐prostatectomy incontinence in BPH patients: A systematic review

Sidharth Panda, Yasmine Adel Mohammed, A. Abdelshafi, H. Mohamed, M. Deameh, T. Mohamed, M. Ramez

UroPrecision, 2026

442 participants

Abstract

Surgical intervention for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) can lead to postoperative stress urinary incontinence. Pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) are proposed as a non‐invasive strategy to mitigate symptoms, but their efficacy and optimal timing remain unclear. A systematic review of six studies (five randomized controlled trials and one prospective cohort) was conducted, evaluating PFME in men undergoing BPH surgery. Three studies investigated preoperative PFME, and three evaluated postoperative interventions. Outcomes included incontinence rates, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life. Evidence for preoperative PFME was mixed; one trial (

n

= 70) demonstrated significantly reduced incontinence at 3 months (3% vs. 26%;

p

= 0.01), while another (

n

= 49) found improved muscle endurance without clinical benefits. In contrast, postoperative PFME showed more consistent improvements. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) (

n

= 61) reported significantly better LUTS at 12 weeks (IPSS: 3.32 vs. 6.33;

p

< 0.001) and better quality of life. Another (

n

= 58) noted fewer incontinent episodes at 1–3 weeks (

p

< 0.01). However, a large multicenter randomized controlled trial (

n

= 442 TURP patients) found no long‐term benefit in incontinence rates at 12 months (65% vs. 62%). In conclusion, PFME may enhance the postoperative recovery of continence and LUTS, particularly when initiated early and performed consistently. Preoperative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 442 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free