Evidence Hub

Transurethral Diode Laser Ablation of Prostate Vs Bipolar Transurethral Vaporization of Prostate, A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Mohamed S. Salim, A. S. Hegazy, Mostafa Mohammad Mohammad Ebraheem Rashed, Ashraf Elsayed Elnagar, Mahmoud Saeed Mahmoud, M. Abuelnaga

The Quarterly journal of medicine, 2024

60 participants

Abstract

Vaporization/Ablation of prostate is becoming one of the standard modalities for treating of symptomatic cases of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) especially in men with bleeding tendency.

to compare the short term safety and efficacy of bipolar plasma versus laser ablation of prostate and follow up over 6 months post operative.

This prospective randomized control study (double armed) included 60 patients with prostates less than 80 gm operated upon and followed up in the Urology Department of Ain Shams University hospitals. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A 30 Patients underwent Transurethral Diode Laser Ablation, Group B 30 Patients underwent Bipolar Transurethral Vaporization as the control group.

When we compared both groups of patients there was no great difference and both techniques proved great efficiency and safety on patients especially in high risk group of patients, and both of them resulted in improvement in all parameters of LUTS secondary to BPH (decrease of IPSS, increase of Q max, decrease of residual urine and PSA). There was no risk or major complication encountered in the study e.g. no significant bleeding and no risk of TUR syndrome. However operation time was shorter in laser group 22 (mean) min compared to 49 min in bipolar group. Also the mean cost of laser group was about 30000 EGP and the mean cost of bipolar group was 20000 EGP in Ain Shams University hospital. Also catheter time was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free