Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Rezūm Water Vapor Thermal Ablation in Large and Small Prostates: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis of 2,725 Patients

M. Al-Ogaili, J. Dham, A. Rangchi, A. Rabie, Maida Bada, N. Tillu, Modassar Awan, Z. Dovey et al.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2026

2,725 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rezūm water vapor therapy is well established for benign prostatic hyperplasia in prostates <80 cc; however, evidence in larger glands remains limited despite increasing demand for minimally invasive alternatives to conventional surgery. We compared outcomes after Rezūm therapy in patients with large versus small prostates.

STUDY DESIGN

In this multicenter retrospective study, 2,725 patients undergoing Rezūm therapy across 5 centers were stratified by prostate volume: large prostate (LP, ≥80 cc; n=993) and small prostate (SP, <80 cc; n=1,732). Primary outcomes were 6-month changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS Quality of Life (QoL), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual (PVR). Secondary outcomes included Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores, complications, and retreatment rates.

RESULTS

At 6 months, LP and SP cohorts achieved comparable improvements in IPSS (41.4% vs 41.9%; p=0.958), QoL (50.0% vs 50.0%; p=0.394), and Qmax (122.2% vs 118.2%; p=0.62). LP patients experienced greater reduction in PVR (68.8% vs 24.0%; p<0.001). SHIM scores remained stable in both groups despite a significant between-group difference. Complication rates were similar (5.0% vs 4.9%; p=0.559). Over a median follow-up of 41 months, LP patients had lower surgical retreatment rates than SP patients (3.6% vs 7.2%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large multicenter cohort, Rezūm therapy provided comparable symptomatic and flow-rate improvement in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,725 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free