Evidence Hub

Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Transperineal Laser Ablation in BPH: A 12-Month Retrospective Analysis

Y. Özlülerden, K. Küçüker, S. Çelen, M. Duran, Aykut Başer, A. Yağcı, Ö. L. Tuncay

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

53 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition in aging men and a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs). While traditional treatments such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are effective, they are associated with notable morbidity. Ultrasound-guided transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to assess the 12-month efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of TPLA in patients with LUTS secondary to BPH. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational cohort study including 53 patients with moderate-to-severe LUTS due to BPH who underwent TPLA between November 2021 and May 2024. Baseline and follow-up assessments were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, including IPSS, Qmax, PVR, prostate volume (MRI), QoL, IIEF-5, and MSHQ-ED/Bother scores. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia using the EchoLaser™ system, and ablation was guided via real-time transrectal ultrasonography. Results: Statistically significant improvements were observed in IPSS (median decrease from 30 to 13), Qmax (5.5 to 13.0 mL/s), and PVR (200 to 85 mL). Prostate and adenoma volumes decreased by 41.2% and 58.3%, respectively. Quality of life scores improved, and erectile function remained stable. Ejaculatory function improved significantly based on MSHQ-ED and MSHQ-Bother scores. No major complications or conversions to surgery occurred. Conclusions: TPLA…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 53 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free