Evidence Hub

Asia-Pacific collaborative consensus statements on water vapor thermal therapy (Rezūm) incorporating a systematic review, a two-round Delphi survey, and a consensus meeting

Brian W. H. Siu, J. M. Ho, X. Fam, Yu-Chao Hsu, M. Park, Jae Hyun Jung, Weida Lau, A. Satjakoesoemah et al.

Prostate International, 2026

Abstract

Background Water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT) is a minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). While its efficacy has been demonstrated, high-quality evidence concerning optimal patient selection and perioperative management is limited, leading to heterogeneous application. This is an Asia-Pacific (APAC) collaborative effort aiming to develop a consensus statement to standardize various aspects of WVTT therapy for clinical practice and to guide future research. Methods The consensus statement was developed using a modified Delphi method, consistent with previous urological consensus statements. First, a systematic review was performed to identify areas of uncertainty across the entire WVTT clinical pathway. Next, 150 urologists from the Asia-Pacific region with experience in WVTT were invited to complete a two-round online Delphi survey. Finally, a 13-member consensus panel meeting (each with ≥50 cases of experience) was held to review, discuss, and re-vote on statements without prior consensus. ‘Consensus agree’ was pre-defined as follow: ≥70% of participants scoring a statement 7-9 and ≤15% scoring it 1-3 (on a 9-point Likert scale). Results Based on the ‘uncertainties’ review of 197 studies, 92 statements were generated. Through two rounds of Delphi survey, consensus was reached on 74 statements. The consensus panel reached agreement on a further 10 out of 18 statements, resulting in 84 final statements. The statements provide…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free