Evidence Hub

A multi-center, randomized, open label, two-arm study to evaluate safety & efficacy of nutraceutical tablet as adjuvant when compared with standard of care in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Suresh B. Patankar, Anupama Patankar, S. Patankar, Rajesh Raje, Chandu Devanpally, Pranjal Ausekar, GauravPatil, Shraddha Chitale

Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 2024

140 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background Benign Prostrate Hyperplasia (BPH) is a progressive disease of ageing men that may be associated with enlargement of the prostate and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Herbal/Nutraceutical formulations in addition to standard of care (SOC) could alleviate the symptoms, and thus improve the quality of life of patients. Objectives To evaluate safety & efficacy of nutraceutical tablet as an adjuvant with SOC. Materials and Methods This was a prospective, randomized two-arm study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Herbal/Nutraceutical Formulation (IP) + SOC versus only SOC, in BPH patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in international prostate symptom score (IPSS) within and between two arms. The safety was evaluated in terms of adverse events and change in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. Results 140 eligible patients (70 / arm) were evaluated for efficacy and safety endpoints. The baseline characteristics of patients in two arms differed nonsignificantly. The change in IPSS-storage, voiding and QoL scores, from day 1 to 90 were statistically significant in both the arms (p < 0.0001). However, by day 90, the change in these scores in SOC+IP arm were significantly higher than that of SOC arm. Further, the change in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores was significant in SOC+IP arm (p < 0.05), while non-significant in SOC arm. The adverse events non-significantly differed between two arms. Conclusion The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 140 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free