Evidence Hub

Characterizing Hospitalizations for Pediatric Concussion and Trends in Care

Tara Rhine, Terri L. Byczkowski, Mekibib Altaye, Shari L. Wade, Lynn Babcock

Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2018

10,729 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Children hospitalized for concussion may be at a higher risk for persistent symptoms, but little is known about this subset of children. OBJECTIVE: Delineate a cohort of children admitted for concussion, describe care practices received, examine factors associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) or emergency department (ED) readmission, and investigate changes in care over time. DESIGN, SETTING: Retrospective analysis of data submitted by 40 pediatric hospitals to the Pediatric Health Information System. PATIENTS: Children 0 to 17 years old admitted with a primary diagnosis of concussion from 2007 to 2014. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive statistics characterized this cohort and care practices delivered, logistic regression identified factors associated with a LOS of =2 days and ED readmission, and trend analyses assessed changes in care over time. RESULTS: Of the 10,729 children admitted for concussion, 68.7% received intravenous pain or antiemetic medications. Female sex, adolescent age, and having government insurance were all associated (P = .02) with increased odds of LOS = 2 days and ED revisit. Proportions of children receiving intravenous ondansetron (slope = 1.56, P = .001) and ketorolac (slope = 0.61, P < .001) increased over time, and use of neuroimaging (slope = -1.75, P < .001) decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Although concussions are usually selflimited, hospitalized children often receive intravenous therapies despite an unclear benefit. Factors associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10,729 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free