Evidence Hub

Adherence to National Standard Treatment Guidelines in the management of hypertension and associated factors among healthcare providers at public district hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

GASPER SINGFRID MUNG'ONG'O, Daniel Msilanga, Paul Alikado Sabuni, Humphrey Godwin Medarakini, Gladys Reuben Mahiti, Rose N. M. Mpembeni

PLOS Global Public Health, 2026

397 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Hypertension affects 15-25% of adults in Tanzania, yet fewer than 30% of treated patients achieve blood pressure control. Poor control contributes to stroke, heart failure, and renal disease. The National Standard Treatment Guidelines (NSTGs), 6th edition (2021), provide guidance for management, but healthcare provider adherence to the guidelines remains unclear. A mixed-methods cross-sectional study was conducted at five public district hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania between 1st April and 31st May 2025. Quantitative data from patient records assessed healthcare provider adherence to pharmacological treatment, complication monitoring, and comorbidity screening, categorized as complete, partial, or non-adherent. Modified Poisson regression identified associated patient and provider factors. Qualitative data from 11 in-depth interviews were thematically analysed to explore barriers and facilitators to adherence. The median age of the 397 patients was 55 years (IQR: 52-61), 79.1% were female, 40.0% had at least one comorbidity, and 65.2% were overweight. Only 26.2% were managed with complete adherence to NSTGs. Higher adherence was associated with follow-up visits (aPR = 5.81; 95% CI: 1.59-21.27), Grade 1 hypertension (aPR = 3.87; 95% CI: 1.99-7.53), Grade 2 hypertension (aPR = 5.06; 95% CI: 1.52-16.73), comorbidities (aPR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.25-4.41), specialist cadre (aPR = 7.00; 95% CI: 1.05-46.55), and provider experience of 5-10 years (aPR = 3.25; 95% CI: 1.17-9.03)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 397 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free