Evidence Hub

Impact of direct-acting antivirals for HCV on mortality in a large population-based cohort study

N. Janjua, S. Wong, Younathan Abdia, Dahn Jeong, Terri Buller-Tylor, P. Adu, H. Samji, J. Wilton et al.

Journal of Hepatology, 2021

10,855 participants · 57 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the effect of sustained virologic response(SVR) from direct acting antiviral(DAA) treatments on all-cause, liver- and drug-related mortality in a population-based cohort in British Columbia(BC), Canada.

METHODS

We used data from the BC Hepatitis Testers Cohort, which includes people tested for hepatitis C virus(HCV) since 1990, linked with data on medical visits, hospitalizations, prescription drugs and mortality. We followed people who received DAAs and people who did not receive any HCV treatment to death or December 31, 2019. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW) to balance the baseline profile of treated and untreated individuals and performed multivariable proportional hazard modeling to assess effect of DAAs on mortality.

FINDINGS

There were 10,855 people treated with DAAs (SVR: 10,426 [96%], no-SVR: 425) and 10,855 untreated individuals. Median follow-up time was 2.2 years (interquartile range: 1.3-3.6; maximum: 6.2). The all-cause mortality rate was 19.5/1000 person-years (PY) among the SVR group(deaths=552), 86.5/1000 PY among the no-SVR group (deaths=96), and 99.2/1000 PY among the untreated group (deaths=2133). In the multivariable model, SVR was associated with significant reduction in all-cause(adjusted hazard ratio[aHR]:0.19, 95%CI:0.17-0.21), liver-(subdistribution HR[asHR]:0.22, 95%CI: 0.18-0.27) and drug-related mortality(asHR: 0.26, 95%CI:0.21-0.32) compared to no-treatment. Older age and cirrhosis were associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10,855 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free