Evidence Hub

Pharmacological safety and real-world efficacy of the potassium-competitive acid blocker fexuprazan in cardiovascular patients receiving antithrombotic therapy: a prospective cohort study (FEXGARD)

Hwang YM, Kim SJ, Yoo M

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026

400 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients with CVD receiving long-term antithrombotic therapy, increasing gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk. Potassium-competitive acid blockers, such as fexuprazan, provide rapid and potent acid suppression; however, relevant evidence in this high-risk population is limited. This study evaluated the effects of fexuprazan on fasting serum gastrin levels, GERD symptoms, and bleeding outcomes in patients with CVD receiving antithrombotic agents.

METHODS: In this prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary hospital, 400 patients receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy were administered fexuprazan. Fasting venous blood samples were collected at baseline and 6 months, and total serum gastrin levels were measured. GERD symptoms were assessed using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG). Secondary outcomes, including GI bleeding, other-site bleeding, and mortality, were recorded over 12 months. Subgroup analyses were performed according to antithrombotic regimen and age.

RESULTS: Fexuprazan significantly increased fasting serum gastrin (152.1 ± 215.9 vs. 249.1 ± 210.3 pg/mL; p < 0.001) and improved FSSG total scores (16.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.0 ± 6.0; p < 0.001). During the 12 months, two GI bleeding events (0.5%), 11 other-site bleeding events (2.8%), and no deaths occurred. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences between users of antiplatelet agents, warfarin, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 400 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free