Evidence Hub

Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, in healthy male subjects

Sunwoo J, Oh J, Moon SJ, Ji SC, Lee SH, Yu KS, Kim HS, Lee A et al.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2018

72 participants · 60 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, DWP14012, is in clinical development as a potential alternative to proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of acid-related diseases.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of DWP14012 in humans.

METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending dose (SAD and MAD, respectively) study was conducted in healthy male subjects without Helicobacter pylori infection. Subjects randomly received a single oral dose of 10-320 mg DWP14012, esomeprazole (active comparator) or placebo in the SAD study (n = 72) and once daily doses of 20-160 mg DWP14012, esomeprazole or placebo for 7 days in the MAD study (n = 48; 8:2:2). Tolerability was evaluated using a microRNA-122 assay. Pharmacodynamics were evaluated through 24-hour gastric pH monitoring, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated plasma and urine DWP14012 concentrations.

RESULTS: DWP14012 was generally well tolerated. The liver toxicity of DWP14012 was not higher than that of placebo after multiple oral administrations. DWP14012 showed rapid and sustained suppression of gastric acid secretion for 24 hours after dosing. Clear dose-response and exposure-response relationships were observed. Plasma concentrations of DWP14012 increased in a dose-proportional manner in the MAD study, whereas in the SAD study, DWP14012 did not significantly accumulate in the plasma.

CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 72 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free